Wow what a lot of treatment changes, no chance to see if any were going to have an effect. 3x Nplate then classing it as failed is ridiculous.
Platelet infusions should only be used if there is life threatening bleeding, will only provide a temporary rise and are a waste of a donation if administered as a treatment to raise count in the absence of life threatening bleeding
Rituximab should be 4 infusions and can take up to 12 weeks to work after the course has been completed.
Romiplistim (NPlate) and Promacta (Eltrombopag) have different modes of action.
Please read this link
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515841/
. It was published last year and is extremely well referenced. I suggest you ask your wife's haemo if she has read it.
The abstract states "Some patients do not benefit from the first TPO-RA they receive, so it is assumed that the alternate TPO-RA would have the same outcome. However, eltrombopag and romiplostim have distinct pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and may have different tolerability and efficacy in individual patients with ITP. Published retrospective studies showed that >75% of patients who switched to the alternate TPO-RA maintained or achieved a response with the new treatment. Notably, most patients who switched due to lack of efficacy with the first TPO-RA responded to the alternate TPO-RA, which demonstrates an absence of cross-resistance between the two drugs. Therefore, switching to the alternate TPO-RA if the first TPO-RA fails to demonstrate a response should be considered before the use of a less-preferable option."
There is another TPO-RA recently approved by the FDA called Avatrombopag which has no dietary restrictions. Not been approved over here in the UK yet unfortunately.
Well done on seeking a second opinion, I hope you get a better haemo than the current one who appears to be ill informed and not upto date.
Don't even think about splenectomy at this stage. There is no guarantee it will work and is not without risks.
Latest guidelines
ashpublications.org/bloodadvances/article/3/22/3780/428877/Updated-international-consensus-report-on-the
(weird looking link but it works) state "If possible, splenectomy should be deferred for ≥1 year to allow for remission"
Always question doctors about the evidence base they are using. Their practice must be evidence based and up to date. Each patient is an individual just because a treatment works for one patient doesn't mean it will work for another.