In this issue of the e-news
CONTENTS:
- Screening for Genetic Mutations for the Early Diagnosis of Common Variable Immunodeficiency in Children With Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia
- Effects of Tranexamic Acid Prophylaxis on Bleeding Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancy
Screening for Genetic Mutations for the Early Diagnosis of Common Variable Immunodeficiency in Children With Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia

Comments from PDSA’s Medical Advisors:
This is an interesting study that explores underlying immunologic defects associated with ITP in children who had a low platelet count for more than three months, did not respond to two or more ITP treatments in past, and were dependent on drugs such as steroids to avoid bleeding. Overall, this groups represents only a small number of children with ITP.
The study suggests that CVID may be diagnosed early in children with ITP particularly if they have clinical symptoms suggestive of CVID and are resistant to steroids. The management would be altered in those patients if they were known to have likely CVID. According to the criteria indicated in the study, however, measuring immunoglobulin levels would be a step before genetic testing. Genetic testing is still valuable even in children already known to have these low immunoglobulin levels to confirm a diagnosis, however not finding a mutation does not rule out CVID since only a small group of patients with CVID have a hereditary form. The big picture is that this study further identifies a subgroup of children with persistent and chronic ITP who may benefit from genetic testing for CVID, and who may find an explanation for why their ITP has not resolved.
Effects of Tranexamic Acid Prophylaxis on Bleeding Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancy

Results revealed there was no difference in the amount or severity of bleeding events between those receiving TXA and those who were not. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of number of patients who needed a platelet transfusion. There were also no deaths due to bleeding in either group (TXA vs not using TXA). While the study did not show that TXA reduced bleeding or the severity of bleeding in participants, it did demonstrate that the drug is safe and does not increase the risk for thrombosis (formation of blood clots), even among patients with multiple thrombotic risk factors due to their malignancy.
https://ash.confex.com/ash/2020/webprogram/Paper138920.html
Comments from PDSA’s Medical Advisors:
The results of this study are disappointing, but not entirely unexpected. The pathophysiology of bleeding after chemotherapy and transplantation is complicated and involves damage to blood vessels in addition to thrombocytopenia, which is the primary cause of bleeding in ITP. TXA works best at sites where clot lysis (breakdown) is most intense, for example in the nose, mouth, throat, gums and urinary track. Many hematologists will appropriately continue to recommend TXA for patients with ITP (and specific other causes of bleeding such as hemophilia or von Willebrand disease) who are experiencing bleeding or in anticipation of surgery at those sites. The finding that thrombosis was not more prevalent in the TXA group is reassuring. Another similar study is nearing completion and it will be of interest if it confirms the findings of Dr. Gernsheimer’s study.
Special Thanks to our e-News Sponsor: